I did have a Twitter. All I was doing was following the podcast guys I listen to and a couple of celebrities. A lot the tweets I saw were ads for things these celebs support. I think I tweeted once or twice. I have a lot to say (DUH) but I can't say it all that quickly and that frequently. I practically never update my status on Facebook. I think people who update their Facebook status more than 5 times a day should definitely get themselves a Twitter.
What is this cultural obsession with the food celebrities are eating, the places they're going, and the things they are wearing? Entire publications have been based on this phenomenon of wanting to know ever single thing about the lives of the rich and famous. Apparently People magazines once a week are not enough. Followers want info as frequently as it will come to them. This instant gratification thing has gotten way out of control.
Twitter is a media that doesn't encourage
editing oneself. It's always there on your computer or on your phone if you are
not near it. It takes all of five seconds to type something and hit
"send" or "enter" or "tweet this now" and then
whatever you were thinking about is out there forever. That's how the whole
Internet is but there's something about it being that instant.
There is a tendency in my generation to lose
focus quickly. I can only imagine this tendency will continue.
Twitter creators have defined tweets as "a
short burst of inconsequential information," and that could potentially be
useful in a situation like this:
"Iceberg ahead, send help" or "Took poison, not really dead, @Romeo"
Here are some situations in which Twitter is not really helping anyone:
"Iceberg ahead, send help" or "Took poison, not really dead, @Romeo"
Here are some situations in which Twitter is not really helping anyone:
“Classical music is tight yo” and “Man…whatever happened to
my antique fish tank”
Those are tweets by Kanye West who, of course, is everything
that is wrong with the world in his own way. I think he knows it too and plays
off of that.
But anyway, I really enjoy books and readings. It’s still
difficult for me to sit down and read. I get distracted and know that somewhere
on the Internet, there’s an explanation that will take me 5 minutes to read.
What a waste! Books are meant to be read not summarized and sliced down. I
can’t imagine how literature classes go for people who don’t like to read. I
can’t imagine what their life is like either. When there is news on the
Internet in one page articles with a few sentences in a paragraph and summaries
of everything you might not want to read, how do you allow someone to
appreciate decent writing and enjoy it?
In one big run on sentence, here’s Twitter: you’ve got the
instant gratification component that whatever you say it’s there for everyone,
you have the over exposure of everything in your life that you choose to tweet
(do I really care that your turkey sandwich was a lot better yesterday than the
one you got today?), you have the constant insight into the lives of your
favorite celebrity to you can further the illusion that you know them, and you
have the bits of news from all outlets that translates into being well
informed.
All this craziness is too much to handle. Perhaps one day I
will reopen my Twitter account and use it for good. I don’t think every Twitter
user is out to stupefy their followers, but I can see it happening. Do you have Twitter? What do you use it for? What are the upsides I'm totally ignoring?
1 comment:
I have a twitter!! I mostly use it as a hockey news source. I follow a bunch of journalists and players. There are some really great hockey writers who write for websites I don't usually visit and they post links to their articles. I find myself reading tweets as a way to find other things to read. I never used to tweet before like last week, but I've found that it's also a good outlet for me during hockey games when I have so many thoughts and reactions. I don't really need an audience; I just need to express :)
Hope all is well in Indiana!!!
Love,
@hrmowery
Post a Comment